I love Girls Aloud. Ugh. So, I haven't posted in OVER a week. That's so awesome. I'm so awesome. The world is so awesome!
Stop self-degrading, J.D.
Hah. ANYWAY. I was also trying to do something earlier - on Monday - for a post that obviously didn't work out (older readers may know what I'm alluding to), but I managed to salvage something. It's a review-ish thing of Julian Jarrold's
Brideshead Revisited, which I saw last week. I figured since I haven't been doing anything here in a while that I might as well post it. It's quite loud, too!
My first thoughts were a resounding "WTF? Why on earth was this so goddamn baiting?" Practically everything in the film - the costumes, art direction, cinematography, editing, score, the way the story is 'handled,' even the performances - all scream "GIVE US AWARDS!!!" to the point where you're scratching your head, wondering why it's being so presumptuous. Now, if it were the Miramax of the mid-late '90s under the tyrannical control of Harvey Weinstein, I could see this screaming not going to waste. Then again, even for him, the film would have to be good, or even enjoyable (probably meaning Chocolat), whatsoever for him to work his touch. So yes, the film blows. It's major weakness is, like I said, the obviously pointless and unsuccessful cloud of awards-whoring that SWARMS everything - but that's a starting place. It's a ridiculous, mishandled mess that doesn't make as much sense as it thinks it does. Characters and events of supposed importance aren't given explanations for their being in the story. The ensemble almost uniformly doesn't help. Matthew Goode is just bland. Sexy blandness, mind you, but Ryder isn't supposed to be JUST eye candy, and it feels like no one told him this. Ben Whishaw as the closeted alcoholic Sebastian probably isn't as bad as he could be, but he isn't really that good. Which reminds me - one of my biggest problems was the relationship between them and how it baffling it was. I can't judge from how well the novel and the original mini-series handle it, but literally throughout the film, they teeter back and forth in and out of love without even trying to explain they were in the first place - IF THEY WERE AT ALL. It is just too confusing to measure. Whatever subtext is there is confused and muffled, and of course the two actors do nothing to help. And Hayley Atwell?! She can't possibly be worse in anything than she was in Cassandra's Dream, but she was so damn ridiculous, and strangely histrionic. Ironically the one time she was probably meant to be ridiculous - The Duchess - she actually managed an rather good, coherent performance. What the hell is wrong with that girl? Now, not everyone sucked. Of course I'm talking about Emma Thompson, who, despite being thoroughly let down by the film around her, manages to be strong and commanding and kind of great. But let down by the film, let me reiterate. Finally, let it be said that between this and Becoming Jane (which I rather liked but it's SUCH a Pride & Prejudice rip-off), Julian Jarrold is an unoriginal, laud-hungry hack who should either take a step back and self-criticize his techniques or crawl into a cave and fade away from memory.
I love hating stuff, tho it rarely happens. It's so much fun!
In other news:
Oh. MY. GOD.I'M NOT SURE WHICH TO BE MORE EXCITED ABOUT?! I mean, I've seen
The Seventh Seal, and it's readily available already to anyone who wants to see it (unlike
Marienbad - grumbles), but LOOK AT THAT COVER ART?! And come on, it's gotta be so bleakly gorgeous in Blu as to rot your mind in medieval existential ecstasy.
But
Last Year at Marienbad has eluded me (and probably lots of others) for so long that I'm REALLY ecstatic for that. Except that the cover seems... nothing. Like, embossed. That's it. Isn't it supposed to be filled to the brim with gorgeous shots or something? Well I don't doubt Criterion's judgment in choosing it. They're so on the ball most of the time
(like on the right!) that any underwhelming art isn't so important.
Hm, any other random news? ... I can't come up with anything. Oh! Maybe. Tonight's
Gossip Girl was strange to say the least? Like, can anyone explain Chuck's subplot to me? Leighton Meester was fucking awesome tonight though. Then again, when isn't she? Sigh. That girl deserves all the Emmys in the world, but she'll never get them. :(
And, um...

I'm probably gonna get shot for that, but it's relevant AND the truth. And
James is probably the only one who knows why. I mean, seriously, DO YOU watch the show? Thought not. Ugh. Ooh, speaking of him, don't forget to check out
his Top Ten of 2008, which he posted yesterday!
And if you think mid-March is late, wait till you see mine! Which should be in...May. If not later. The Chloes wouldn't be so consistently late if I lived in NYC or something. So.
Can somebody take me to NY?
PLEASE?Yes, I'm pleading.
*Sigh.*